<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How Should Content Strategists, Publishers Address Sidewiki?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://danieleizans.com/2009/12/on-addressing-sidewiki/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://danieleizans.com/2009/12/on-addressing-sidewiki/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 15:45:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stacy Lukasavitz</title>
		<link>http://danieleizans.com/2009/12/on-addressing-sidewiki/comment-page-1/#comment-144</link>
		<dc:creator>Stacy Lukasavitz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 22:48:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danieleizans.com/?p=293#comment-144</guid>
		<description>A client of mine recently learned about SideWiki and sent me a link to a similar blog post about it, kind of in panic, asking me for my take on it. I&#039;ll admit that when I first learned about SideWiki when it debuted, I pretty much brushed it off, but I decided to give it more thought and research. 

I agree with you that people need to be more focused on mo&#039; better content and will need to be more transparent on the web out of necessity, but it&#039;s been 6 months since SideWiki has debuted now and I&#039;m very apprehensive about the reality of the widespread adoption rate. Apple.com only has like, 4 entries on its SideWiki and all but one are positive. I had to install Google Toolbar on my FF just to be able to SEE SideWikis and through browsing I haven&#039;t found many sites even using them. I added one to my site out of curiosity yesterday to see if anybody will even find it. 

I&#039;ve gotten the picture that this is another idea that Google had that might be a cool idea but just won&#039;t take off the way they&#039;d like it to. I&#039;ve talked to many web users, some your &quot;Average Joe websurfer&quot; and some more power users like you and me, and most hadn&#039;t heard of it, those that had heard of it didn&#039;t really understand what it was, and nobody really seemed to care much. 

Personally, from a user perspective, I see it as simply TMI and not really necessary. If I go to, say, a restaurant&#039;s site, I&#039;m probably there to download a copy of the menu, not read what people think about that restaurant -- there&#039;s Yelp for that. If I&#039;m looking for what people think about a retail store or brand or whatever, I know there are plenty of other places online to find that information. I just don&#039;t see much of a need for it, unless maybe for higher education institutions - I can see how that might be useful for a kid scouting colleges, but even still, there are already places to go online for that kind of information.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A client of mine recently learned about SideWiki and sent me a link to a similar blog post about it, kind of in panic, asking me for my take on it. I&#8217;ll admit that when I first learned about SideWiki when it debuted, I pretty much brushed it off, but I decided to give it more thought and research. </p>
<p>I agree with you that people need to be more focused on mo&#8217; better content and will need to be more transparent on the web out of necessity, but it&#8217;s been 6 months since SideWiki has debuted now and I&#8217;m very apprehensive about the reality of the widespread adoption rate. Apple.com only has like, 4 entries on its SideWiki and all but one are positive. I had to install Google Toolbar on my FF just to be able to SEE SideWikis and through browsing I haven&#8217;t found many sites even using them. I added one to my site out of curiosity yesterday to see if anybody will even find it. </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve gotten the picture that this is another idea that Google had that might be a cool idea but just won&#8217;t take off the way they&#8217;d like it to. I&#8217;ve talked to many web users, some your &#8220;Average Joe websurfer&#8221; and some more power users like you and me, and most hadn&#8217;t heard of it, those that had heard of it didn&#8217;t really understand what it was, and nobody really seemed to care much. </p>
<p>Personally, from a user perspective, I see it as simply TMI and not really necessary. If I go to, say, a restaurant&#8217;s site, I&#8217;m probably there to download a copy of the menu, not read what people think about that restaurant &#8212; there&#8217;s Yelp for that. If I&#8217;m looking for what people think about a retail store or brand or whatever, I know there are plenty of other places online to find that information. I just don&#8217;t see much of a need for it, unless maybe for higher education institutions &#8211; I can see how that might be useful for a kid scouting colleges, but even still, there are already places to go online for that kind of information.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

